Winter has
set in. This season of the year, apart from ample drawbacks, has also some
upsides, such as absence of insects and one group of motorists you should
beware of.
Generally,
the warmer it gets, the more drivers give up on their cars and swap them for
motorcycles and bikes. They share public roads with four-wheel-vehicle users,
but often make advantages of smaller width of their vehicles what drives many
car drivers, including me, insane.
Don’t get
me wrong dear readers*. My intentions are far from decrying cyclists and
depriving them of their right to use public roads. Cycling has several merits:
keeps people healthy and fit, provides a daily does of physical exercise for
those who otherwise would not find time for moving their arses, saves money and
environment. But whatever you do, you should do it prudently and not expect
others to think and take responsibility for your deeds instead of you, just
because you are weaker [than drivers protected by bodyworks of their vehicles] or
privileged [cyclists tend to be hailed as such category of road users].
According
to Polish traffic regulations, cyclists should attempt to use the road and ride
through pavements only when sharing the road with cars is forbidden or
impractical. Cyclists are prohibited from moving on motorways, expressway,
fast-traffic roads and other roads marked with relevant signage. Cyclists who
use pavements should always give way to pedestrians and take off their bikes
when they cross a street. This obligation does not apply when a cyclist rides a
cycling path, on which they are superior to pedestrians and have right of way
over cars if the path crosses the street.
I should
not say “law is an ass”, but some regulations do not contribute to increasing
safety on the roads. Let’s examine some imperfections of Polish traffic law and
some sins committed by cyclists and motorcyclists.
Every
candidate for a driver to get a driving license needs to pass a test in order
to prove they know traffic regulations. Such requirement prevents people who
know little about traffic rules from causing dangerous situations on the roads.
A cyclist who is not under 18, subject to the same traffic regulations, as a
road user, does not need to prove their knowledge of traffic law. This results
in scores of cyclists blissfully ignorant of perils the may cause or they may
be caused by car drivers. I opine that any person riding a bike on a public
road has its command of basic traffic rules certified. It can take a little
hassle and bureaucracy (that can be easily limited – test materials can be
available online, test that costs no more than 50 PLN is taken in exam centre,
then a cyclist picks up a piece of plastic, if someone has a valid driving
license, the procedure is not needed at all), but could prevent many accidents.
The biggest
sin of cyclists is taking a busy road, when there is a cycling path running
parallel to it. The classic example is ul. Puławska between the boundary of
Warsaw and ul. Energetyczna in Piaseczno, the section where speed limit is 70
kmph. The road was widened to 3 lanes and a very decent cycling path along it
was built in 2007. Despite dreamt-up infrastructure, some inconsiderate bike
enthusiasts refuse to take the cycling path and share the road with cars,
risking lives. Is there any excuse for such thoughtless behaviour?
A common
sin of single-track vehicle users which winds me up the most, is moving between
lanes (to be precise, on lines marking them out) and thus often slaloming
between them. This used to be a domain of motorcyclists and scooter-riders,
whose engine-propelled vehicles are much faster and thus have edge over
slow-moving cars. When weather permits them to get on their machines, even when
my car is not in motion I continuously peek at both wing mirrors and if
possible move to other end of my lane to let them overtake me in safe distance.
The real nightmare crops up when two motorcyclists overtake me from both sides
at the same time – this may happen not only on middle, but also on right lane
(I tend to use it whenever I can, as the traffic law instructs), when one
motor-rider dashes between middle and right lane, while the other moves on the
edge of the right one. I then pray there is a few centimetres space on each
side of the car…
The warrant
to avoid cycling on pavements also lacks common sense to me. Much depends on
the situation. The busier the roads and the faster cars move on it, the more
advisable it is for a cyclist to give up on taking it. As a cyclist I do use
roads, when I feel safe on them and when my common sense tells me I would do
more harm than good by choosing a pavement (one nuisance of riding the pavement
is having to cross curbs). When there is no pavement, I use roadside, no matter
how bumpy it is. A classic example here might be ul. Karczunkowska, where I
never share the road with cars, since drivers tend to speed there. Of course I
am entitled to use the road, but what’s the value of this entitlement if I end
up dead of disabled? When taking the road, I know responsibility for overtaking
me safely rests with car drivers. When taking the pavement, I know
responsibility for not harming pedestrians rests with me. I prefer to trust
myself. The other reason why pavement could be preferable is that accidents on
pavements would not be fatal. Have you ever heard of fatalities when a cyclist
collided with a pedestrian? Of course, reckless cyclists on pavements can
become ‘road hogs’ and the binding traffic law was designed to protect
pedestrians. But what protects car drivers from trauma of running down a
cyclist clearly violating traffic rules? Surely, after such accident a police
could adjudicate the car driver was not guilty, any court would acquit them,
but mental trauma could not disappear until the end of their days.
Any
constructive strategy?
- Build
infrastructure: cycling paths, cycling racks, expand the bike rental schemes.
- Amend the
law: put in place regulations that would require road users to be familiar with
traffic rules, allow them to use pavements when sharing a road is too
precarious
- Punish
mercilessly cyclists who slalom between cars or who use road when cycling path
is at hand.
- Rely on
your common sense, regardless of your role in traffic.
* I
actually wrote the post after almost hitting a pinhead on bike on ul. Puławska
last Monday. Around 7 a.m. (was still dark) I was driving up ul. Puławska,
approaching intersection with ul. Płaskowickiej. I drove some 40 kmph and was
on the middle lane. All of a sudden I noticed a cyclist (he had no lights on
his bike, nor any flashing elements on himself who unexpectedly decided to veer
from right lane to the left. I pushed the brake, peeked in the right wing
mirror and without making sure there was no vehicle in the blind spot
(fortunately no car was there) I swerved right to avoid running down the
cyclist. I was scared out of my wits…
2 comments:
I'm absolutely opposed to any form of cyclist registration or licensing. Or compulsory helmets. Even cycling on pavements should be OK - as long as the cyclist does so slowly and always gives priority to pedestrians. The aim should be to get as many people cycling as possible.
If we look at what happened in Sydney, when helmet-wearing was made mandatory, the number of cycle-users plummeted dramatically; the number of cyclists killed per 100,000km cycled actually rose.
Granted, there are many unthinking cyclists out there, as well as unthinking motorists. But given the relative harm the former do compared to the latter (air pollution, congestion etc), I'd give the former the benefit of the doubt.
The drivers here are horrible. For fun, I count the number of obvious infractions I see while driving in Warsaw. Typically they average about 1 per 3km of travel. Basic things too - driving on a sidewalk, driving on the apron against traffic, making a one lane left turn lane into 2 and on and on.
Also, drivers need to be trained in common courtesy. For example, for the most part Polish drivers do not understand the concept of consecutive merging and will do anything possible not to let someone merge into their lane. I learned to drive in New York and know how to force a merge gently and it really pisses them off when I successfully 'force' them to let me in by inserting the nose of my car far enough to make it happen.
Post a Comment