The opponents of the man-caused global warming claim climate on earth
went through phases of warmer and colder periods and what is happening now is
just another cycle coming over. In principle they are right in the first part
of their assertion, pertaining to history of our planet. They just badly ignore
the pace of changes taking place. In the history, process of climate warming
was spread over centuries; today we are witnessing it progressing decade and
decade, i.e. the climate change is accelerated by the mankind.
To illustrate what is so wrong with the global warming, if anything at
all (one of PiS politicians said recently the global warming is good,since water in the Baltic Sea would finally be warmer), imagine the atmosphere
is a like a pot of water. When the water is cool, you can see it is smooth, but
once you heat it up towards temperature of boiling, you can see particles
fizzling around. The same happens on a global level in an ever-warming
atmosphere – air moves over more quickly which means more extreme events occur around
the world.
To use statistical measures, you may say mean temperatures would generally
rise, but because of the “pot-of-boiling-water” phenomena, standard deviations
from the mean across the globe and over time will be increasing. Also the
frequency of extreme weather will get more intense. In 2019 we had 12 days heat
(defined as day-time high above +30C) in Warsaw while the yearly average is 5. If
each year actual readouts beat the average, something is wrong with the average
(answer: it is derived from 1981-2010 period). Winters will actually get
milder, but cold snaps and heavy snowfalls might hit heavily. Droughts will be
interspersed with floods, just because of uneven distribution of rainclouds in
the atmosphere.
Some side effects might disturbingly work the other way round. Ice melting
in the Arctic and cooling down water in Northern Atlantic Ocean might impair
the Gulf Stream which mildens the climate in the Western Europe, in a
consequence making it harsher. Other side effects work as a self-propelling
mechanism. The growing popularity of electricity-consuming air conditioning
boosts energy production and consequently emission of greenhouse gases during
heat waves. In such sense, each single heat wave gives rise to another one or
exacerbates itself.
What to do to halt the global warming? It is untrue only governments are
responsible for tackling it. The broadest answer is to consume less. What we
consume must be earlier be produced while manufacturing of goods is generally
responsible for emission of greenhouse gases. We should teach ourselves not to
give in to aggressive consumerism and to buy only things we need to possess,
look after them and use them as long as possible rather than replacing them out
of whims. This pertains to clothes, footwear, consumer electronics, furniture and
personal belongings, but even more to vehicles, the way we use them and how
often we change them. I do not encourage you to stop using a car at all, but to
give up nearly altogether on short-distance communing (disturbingly, 40% of passengercar journeys in 2014 were shorter than 2 miles, such short distance I last
covered by car before Easter when I had to drive to the hypermarket to a big
shopping) and switch to public transport where reliable (in big cities
absolutely doable). Instead of an SUV changed every five years a compact car with
a petrol-fuelled (not diesel!) or hybrid engine replaced every fifteen years.
Plus we should vote for politicians who can boast being aware of the problem
and active in tackling it. Here hats down to the mayor of Warsaw who is an
excellent example of environmental-mindful local governor.
1 comment:
The "something amiss" part is obviously with the politician who says the Baltic Sea would finally be warmer.
The "well-argued" part is mostly the whole blog.
Post a Comment