The sudden departure
of lower-house deputy and charity activist Łukasz Litewka brought shock and
grief on many, including me. Of all actors of the Polish political arena, no
other had brought in more benevolence to the disadvantaged, terminally ill and
animals. The tragic twist of fate have chosen him to pass away as a fatality in
a traffic accident.
A noble,
young man suddenly departs, leaving a question why. Just like a Smolensk air crash, the accident looms as so improbable that it goes beyond comprehension of
many.
The
likelihood of being run over in a head-on collision with a car on a road in a
middle of a forest is tiny, yet not equal to zero and with a large dose of bad
luck, it materialised. Had he left home half a minute earlier or later, he
would have escaped death. Most of us, including me, have averted a major
accident more than once by dint of being a few seconds earlier or later in a
deadly spot.
The
theories of an alleged assassination began to sprout very shortly after his
tragic death. Their authors claim Mr Litewka was inconvenient to many by
speaking openly of paedophiles and zoophiles in Kłodzko or by messing with
owners of crummy animal shelters. Frankly speaking, I do not buy it.
Facebook
with its nefarious algorithms has suggested me a group (I deliberately leave
out its name and will not link to it) whose members strive to call into
question the official version of what we know about the accident or (less
often) try to come up with alternative explanations. Out of pure curiosity, I
tried to go through some of the postings, most of which do not hold water
altogether, defy the common sense and basic laws of physics. Not to mention in
this country of seasonal, yet not seasoned expert, thousands of skilled
specialists in traffic accidents involving cyclists have mushroom within last
two weeks. On top there are people who post provocative notes soaking with
crass stupidity, while other group members fall for their twaddle. I do not
commend this, a this a slap on the face of the deceased's nearest and dearest.
Overall, I look at the group with disdain, but would not favour censorship
here, as any attempts to close their mouths would trigger siege mentality.
The tragic
accident ought to bring about a discussion on cyclists' safety. At the scene
there was no cycling path, no pavement, no roadside, no separation of
vulnerable traffic participants from motor vehicles. Mr Litewka did not wear a
helmet, which that time would not have helped him, but in many cases helmets
saved lives or prevented serious injuries.
Last Sunday
I cycled 102.51 kilometres thus have beaten my record of 100.00 kilometres set
on 7 June 2021. On the last day of the long weekend several people went for
recreational bike rides. On the 90th kilometre of my journey, having coasted
through Bulwary Wiślane chock full of people I was approaching Most
Łazienkowski and nearly had a head-on collision with a fellow cyclist. I
quickly skimmed on the rear brake and then on the front on and then gently
swerved. The fellow speeding cyclist had far less reason and skill and ended up
somersaulting over the handlebar. She had a helmet and luckily the only
injuries were bruises and a swollen knee with a bleeding wound. Hearteningly,
most people around stopped by to check if she needed medical aid. I waited half
an hour until the culprit was picked up from the scene by her relatives.
Given the
level of thoughtlessness among cyclists, an incident was just a matter of time.
Unless you collide with a car, cycling gives much less room for serious
injuries compared to travelling by car. Yet, sins of cyclists overlap those of
motorists. Speeding, aggressive overtaking, not looking back ahead of
overtaking, not signalling an intention to turn, abrupt braking, stopping for
no reason and blocking infrastructure are those I see most often. There are
several cases of cyclists not minding pedestrians, or less experienced cycling
path users (elderly people, families with children), the plague are food
delivery bandits on electric bikes doing at 40 kmph on cycling paths.
I advocate
cycling, moving around and commuting by bike and building infrastructure for
muscle-propelled vehicles, but we also need education and enforcement of
traffic rules on cycling paths. An aggressive bike rider would definitely do
less harm than a speeding idiot behind a wheel of a motor vehicle, but cycling
paths, except for where they cross roads, should be a safe place. At least I
wish they were safer than they are now. I cycle a lot and if the traffic is
dense and fellow cyclist not considerate, it can be stressful.
