The quest for a better tomorrow

The day when the new police law comes into force coincides with the monthly overview of Poland’s new rulers’ attainments. As a relatively unpopular foreign-language blogger, I consider my place at the list of enemies of the good change is near the bottom, so I feel free to share my thoughts.

On 19 January the Polish prime minister participated in a debate on threats for democracy in Poland. The course of the debate and its repercussions were a debacle of liberals and a huge victory for Mrs Szydło (whose hollow words and declarations made much better impression than worthless utterances of leftist and liberal deputies) and for all EU-sceptical politicians who put in superb stunt as allies of PiS. The timing of the debate coincided with the news of several refugee rapes in Germany being concealed from the public, a water to the mill of those claiming Germany has no right to interfere into functioning of democracy in Poland if in the name of political correctness they covered up crimes committed by jobless rabble…

On Monday the banking tax came into effect. The draft of the retail trade tax is now in the phase of public consultation and nearly everyone involved tears a strip off it. In the shape it is put forward the biggest retailers who were supposed to bear the burden of the tax are likely to be beneficiaries of it. The most dreadful part of the tax which might be a nail to the coffin of small retailers and which might send several people unemployed is the highertax rate for turnover generated on Saturdays, Sundays and on bank holidays. This will also mean end of cheaper petrol over weekends (it is less costly because many company cars can be fuelled up only during the working week), bigger discrepancies between prices working-week and weekend prices (typical practice for repricing food produces in Auchan) and generally lower competition, since some retailers will drop off. Customer beware, you will pay the bill anyway!

By the way, formally each draft law undergoes public consultation under the lawmaking process. Sound commendably, but I wonder when any amendment proposed by the opposition or any other entity participating in the consultation is included into any final legal act.

The PLN 500 child allowance draft law is also being consulted. There was a short discord between the ministry of finance and the government, but Mr Szałamacha was swiftly taken to the task. Funding for the generous giving away is secured for 2016, when the programme will be serviced only over nine months and when one-off proceeds of PLN 9 billion from LTE frequency auction are to flow in, but streams of revenues which will finance the allowance from 2017 onwards have not been defined. Besides, politicians of PiS keep on appealing to the wealthiest Poles not to apply for the allowance, instead of setting an income cap above which parents would not be entitled to the benefit.

Besides, worth mentioning pace of works on the draft bears testimony to the greatest lie of the pre-election campaign. On 20 October 2015, as the TV debate between Mrs Kopacz and Mrs Szydło was drawing to a close, Mrs Szydło showed a blue file with ready drafts of new laws. She also told she would show the documents during a conference right after the debate. Needless to say subsequently Mrs Szydło only waved the file and has never showed any draft law. An excellent PR stunt, I wonder only why everyone, including journalists and politicians from today’s opposition, has fallen for it no one has taken the trouble to check out what the content of the file was?

And just recently PO came up with a counter-proposal of an even more generous pro-family agenda of giving out PLN 500 for every child, regardless of income per person in a household. Jaw drops open. If the biggest, in terms of number of deputies, party in the opposition, keeps on fooling about like this, in a year they will enjoy support below 10% in the polls. In the meantime Nowoczesna.pl is losing its vigour. In the long run Mr Petru and his partisans are unlikely to retain support above 20% and if they miraculously manage to win the election, they will lose power quickly. Affluent and resourceful people who want lean and efficient state, in other words liberal electorate, make up a tiny, though growing, percentage of voters.

After Standard and Poor's downgraded Poland’s rating, Fitch and Moody’s have announced reviews of Poland’s rating within 12 months and warned of possible downgrades for reasons far more substantive than those behind S&P’s move. As two other rating agencies point out, generous government spending calls into question fiscal balance and in the long-run is likely to decrease creditworthiness of Poland.

The government is getting to grips with the ailments of state-owned coal mines. During the campaign PiS promised not to close any mine and not to make redundant any miner. After the reality check strongly unionised miners, in order to help the government meet its promises, will have to accept salary cuts. Good luck!

Finally the Smolensk crash stands a chance to be scrutinised properly! The new team of experts, some of which even have notion about intricacies of aviation, but none of them has experience in investigating civil nor military passenger airplane crashes, is to carry out an unbiased investigation and definitely will not set any hypothesis in advance; exactly like Mr Macierewicz who signed a decree setting up the team and subsequently during the conference on which establishing the team was announced, adjudicated there had been an explosion which blew up the Tu-154 plane some fifteen or eighteen metres above ground level.

Three weeks into public media takeover, apart from a few spectacular lay-offs, the change I witness is less spectacular than many expected. The extent to which TVP is PiS biased is similar to how TVN is anti-PiS biased. Different views are presented and guests with different views are invited, but the bottom line message delicately instructs audience how to shape their opinion. Nevertheless, fortunately TVP has not stooped to the level of TV Republika, lousy propaganda which would drastically decrease popularity of TVP.

Triple Bee Plus, Outlook Negative

Friday evening. Negative news, as the one from August 2011 on US sovereign rating downgrade, are issued at the end of the working week after markets close, to let market participants “get over” the news and avoid turmoil when trading is resumed on Monday.

Standard and Poor's, one of three main rating agencies downgraded Poland’s sovereign rating from A+/stable to BBB-/negative. The move was par for the course; it was likely to happen, yet not now, but when effects of PiS government’s fiscal and (affected by them) monetary policies would impinge on creditworthiness of Poland. The most astounding aspect of the whole matter was not only the change in rating, but also the outlook. The blow was dealt without warning (i.e. changing rating outlook to negative while upholding the A- grade). On the same day Fitch upheld its A- grade, while Moody’s is bound to review the rating of Poland this year. The saddest aspect of the whole story is that we are witnessing the first downward move in the rating in the history of Poland (it was last upgraded in February 2007 when PiS was in power and upheld throughout eight-year rule of PO-PSL).

The justification (thank you Michael for sharing) of the rating chance indicates at sound macroeconomic foundations of the Polish economy and points at unsettling political moves which disrupt the system of checks and balances, i.e. calling into question independence or empowerment of institutions whose role is also to hinder reckless policies of the government. The impaired constitutional tribunal, paralysed by the new law, with 3 judges elected by the previous parliament and not sworn in, is, according to the recently binding law, not authorised to hand down rulings. Politicians of PiS have openly admitted support for monetary loosening was one of the criteria in choosing among candidates to Monetary Policy Council. Not a scenario creditors of Poland would wish on themselves.

Ministry of Finance in its press release dubbed the Standard and Poor's decision “incomprehensible” (worth reading, as the content of the release holds water, if you turn a blind eye on their command of English). PiS politicians and befriended economists argue rating agencies should focus on performance of economy only. In practice, every sensible lender, to the extent permitted by law, evaluates conduct of their borrower. If you lend money to a private individual you should assess not only their sources of income and spending needs, but also their lifestyle (in practice often prohibited by law), because paradoxically a poor granny who lives off a tiny pension, but dutifully repays her loan might be more creditworthy than a lad in this twenties who has no family and earns well, but leads a lavish lifestyle, goes on a bender every weekend and throws about money. If you lend money to an enterprise you should assess not only numbers in its financial statements, but also its corporate governance rules, strategy and its viability, management and its credibility.

Your opinion of Standard and Poor's assessment might be low. The rating agency has discredited itself many times, yet the grades it issues are respected around the world and affect perception of Poland’s credibility. You might agree with the downgrade or not, but higher yields on Polish bonds will be a fact, also the Polish currency might stay weaker for a while. At the end of the day the taxpayer will pay the bill. I bet on (blue) Monday the WIG20 index opens 3.8% down from Friday’s close (partly driven by dire trading in the US and falling prices of oil and copper) and closes 1.7% down from Friday’s close. I also expect a slight strengthening of PLN, though in mid-term it is likely to be under pressure of general negative sentiment around the world, except for impact of local policies.

You can also ask who pays Standard and Poor's. In general those are potential or existing holders of Polish debt, i.e. in practice financial institutions who (at least partly) rely on the rating agencies’ evaluation in their assessment of Polish bonds’ credit quality. Theoretically, Standard and Poor's should attempt to deliver the best service to their clients, because its role it to attempt to protect their interests as creditors of Poland. The truth might be different, as the example of worthless AAA+ ratings assigned to junk mortgage-backed CDOs best showed.

Finally, is it the revenge of “banksters” for introducing the financialinstitutions tax (president signed the law on Friday) or for the draft of currency mortgage law presented also on Friday? The exact timing is in my view coincidental, but indeed the downgrade might be a form of warning (get your hands off the financial sector) combined with punishment. But on the other hand, if you want to borrow money from somebody, you actually must agree on some conditions and constraints set by lenders and if they perceive you as more risky, your cost of debt will be higher. The principle is simple, if you want to mess with lenders, do not ask them for more money, but reduce your debts. PiS government wants to have a cake and eat it – they will need to borrow more (I do not believe the turnover tax, the financial institutions tax and improving VAT collection will be sufficient to fund 500plus programme, especially in the current macroeconomic environment), and simultaneously ask bankers in and tell them to kneel. I know many can’t wait to finally see bankers on their knees, but such sight is too beautiful to be true!